Google's high-efficiency model for focused subagent work and multi-agent workflows.
Fast and efficient with near-frontier intelligence.
No shared agent demos for these models yet.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
This model hasn't been benchmarked yet.
Both Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Claude Haiku 4.5 are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has a lower blended cost. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite: $0.30 input / $2.50 output. Claude Haiku 4.5: $1.00 input / $5.00 output.
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has a larger context window: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite supports 1M tokens vs Claude Haiku 4.5 at 200K tokens.
Yes, both Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Claude Haiku 4.5 support vision/image input.
Key differences: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is significantly cheaper. Compare full specs on this page.
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite and Claude Haiku 4.5 for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.