Skip to main content
idapt
HomeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Voice Mode
  • Voice HUD
  • Web Search
  • Image Generation
  • Video Generation
  • Audio Generation
  • Transcription
  • Drive
  • Secrets
  • Sharing
  • Workspaces
  • Tasks
  • Memory
  • Agents
  • Subagents
  • Automations
  • Skills
  • Code Execution
  • Computers
  • Computer Use
  • Computer Assist · Soon
  • Cloud Computers
  • Local AI
  • AI Gateway
  • API & SDK
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Tunnels
  • All features →
  • LLM cost calculator
  • Token counter
  • Context window checker
  • Can I run it
  • Model picker quiz
  • Savings finder
  • Video cost estimator
  • Text to speech cost
  • Transcription cost
  • API endpoint tester
  • All free tools →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Learn
  • Prompts
  • Templates
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)

Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Claude Opus 4.1

At a glance

Google's high-efficiency model for coding, agentic workflows, and web and app development.

1.0M ctx$1.50/$7.50 per M

High-capability model for complex reasoning and coding.

77200K ctx$15.00/$75.00 per M#38/92
Agent Demos
All agent demos

No shared agent demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
ReasoningInsufficient data
MathInsufficient data
Sources:Provider·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-21
Cheaper90%
Capability
Capability—
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science—
Math
Competition Math—Research Math—
Coding
Real-World Coding—
Agentic
Terminal Tasks105%78.0%Task Horizon—
Reasoning
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Capability
CapabilityECI76.5
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science73.2%
Math
Competition Math40.0%Research Math5.9%
Coding
Real-World Coding73.3%
Agentic
Terminal Tasks38.0%Task Horizon1.7h
Specs
1.0M
Context
66K
Max output
Jul 2026
Released
200K
Context
32K
Max output
Aug 2025
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input90%$1.50/M tokens
Output90%$7.50/M tokens
Reasoning$7.50/M tokens
Cache read90%$0.15/M tokens
Cache write100%$0.08/M tokens
Image input$1.50/M tokens
Audio input$1.50/M tokens
Web search$0.01/search
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$15.00/M tokens
Output$75.00/M tokens
Cache read$1.50/M tokens
Cache write$18.75/M tokens
Web search29%$0.01/search
Chat with Gemini 3.6 FlashGo to model
Chat with Claude Opus 4.1Go to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Claude Opus 4.1▼

Which is better, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Claude Opus 4.1?

▼

Both Gemini 3.6 Flash and Claude Opus 4.1 are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Claude Opus 4.1?

▼

Gemini 3.6 Flash has a lower blended cost. Gemini 3.6 Flash: $1.50 input / $7.50 output. Claude Opus 4.1: $15.00 input / $75.00 output.

Which has a larger context window, Gemini 3.6 Flash or Claude Opus 4.1?

▼

Gemini 3.6 Flash has a larger context window: Gemini 3.6 Flash supports 1M tokens vs Claude Opus 4.1 at 200K tokens.

Do both Gemini 3.6 Flash and Claude Opus 4.1 support vision?

▼

Yes, both Gemini 3.6 Flash and Claude Opus 4.1 support vision/image input.

What are the key differences between Gemini 3.6 Flash and Claude Opus 4.1?

▼

Key differences: Gemini 3.6 Flash is significantly cheaper. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Gemini 3.6 Flash and Claude Opus 4.1 for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App