Skip to main content
idapt
HomeCodeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Voice Mode
  • Voice HUD
  • Web Search
  • Image Generation
  • Video Generation
  • Audio Generation
  • Transcription
  • Drive
  • Credentials
  • Sharing
  • Workspaces
  • Tasks
  • Memory
  • Agents
  • Subagents
  • Automations
  • Skills
  • idapt Code
  • Code Execution
  • Computers
  • Computer Use
  • Computer Assist · Soon
  • Containers · Soon
  • Cloud Computers
  • Local AI
  • AI Gateway
  • API & SDK
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Tunnels
  • All features →
  • LLM cost calculator
  • Token counter
  • Context window checker
  • Can I run it
  • Model picker quiz
  • Savings finder
  • Video cost estimator
  • Text to speech cost
  • Transcription cost
  • API endpoint tester
  • All free tools →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Skills
  • Learn
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • idapt Code
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)

Gemma 2 27B vs DeepSeek V4 Pro

At a glance

Second-generation open model from Google DeepMind.

578K ctx$0.65/$0.65 per M#72/92

Open-source 1.6T-parameter MoE with 49B active, built for advanced reasoning and long-horizon agents.

821.0M ctx$0.43/$0.87 per M#21/92
Agent Demos
All agent demos

No shared agent demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Capability
CapabilityECI56.8
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science36.5%Factual Recall—
Math
Math Problems27.9%Competition Math1.4%
Coding
Real-World Coding—
Reasoning
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Smarter44%Cheaper16%
Capability
CapabilityECI44%81.6
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science146%89.6%Factual Recall57.0%
Math
Math Problems—Competition Math6860%96.7%
Coding
Real-World Coding77.6%
Specs
8K
Context
2K
Max output
Jul 2024
Released
1.0M
Context
256K
Max output
Apr 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0.65/M tokens
Output25%$0.65/M tokens
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input33%$0.43/M tokens
Output$0.87/M tokens
Cache read$0.004/M tokens
Chat with Gemma 2 27BGo to model
Chat with DeepSeek V4 ProGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Gemma 2 27B vs DeepSeek V4 Pro▼

Which is better, Gemma 2 27B or DeepSeek V4 Pro?

▼

Based on the Capability Index, DeepSeek V4 Pro scores higher (81.6 vs 56.8). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 2 27B or DeepSeek V4 Pro?

▼

DeepSeek V4 Pro has a lower blended cost. Gemma 2 27B: $0.65 input / $0.65 output. DeepSeek V4 Pro: $0.43 input / $0.87 output.

Which has a larger context window, Gemma 2 27B or DeepSeek V4 Pro?

▼

DeepSeek V4 Pro has a larger context window: Gemma 2 27B supports 8K tokens vs DeepSeek V4 Pro at 1M tokens.

What are the key differences between Gemma 2 27B and DeepSeek V4 Pro?

▼

Key differences: DeepSeek V4 Pro has a notably higher capability index (24.8 point gap); only DeepSeek V4 Pro offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Gemma 2 27B and DeepSeek V4 Pro for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App