Meta's efficient multimodal MoE model with 16 experts.
OpenAI's fastest, most affordable GPT-5.6 tier for high-volume, latency-sensitive work.
No shared agent demos for these models yet.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
This model hasn't been benchmarked yet.
Both Llama 4 Scout and GPT 5.6 Luna are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.
Llama 4 Scout has a lower blended cost. Llama 4 Scout: $0.10 input / $0.30 output. GPT 5.6 Luna: $1.00 input / $6.00 output.
GPT 5.6 Luna has a larger context window: Llama 4 Scout supports 328K tokens vs GPT 5.6 Luna at 1.1M tokens.
Yes, both Llama 4 Scout and GPT 5.6 Luna support vision/image input.
Key differences: Llama 4 Scout is significantly cheaper; only GPT 5.6 Luna offers extended reasoning mode. Compare full specs on this page.
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Llama 4 Scout and GPT 5.6 Luna for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.