Skip to main content
idapt
HomeCodeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Voice Mode
  • Voice HUD
  • Web Search
  • Image Generation
  • Video Generation
  • Audio Generation
  • Transcription
  • Drive
  • Credentials
  • Sharing
  • Workspaces
  • Tasks
  • Memory
  • Agents
  • Subagents
  • Automations
  • Skills
  • idapt Code
  • Code Execution
  • Computers
  • Computer Use
  • Computer Assist · Soon
  • Containers · Soon
  • Cloud Computers
  • Local AI
  • AI Gateway
  • API & SDK
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Tunnels
  • All features →
  • LLM cost calculator
  • Token counter
  • Context window checker
  • Can I run it
  • Model picker quiz
  • Savings finder
  • Video cost estimator
  • Text to speech cost
  • Transcription cost
  • API endpoint tester
  • All free tools →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Skills
  • Learn
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • idapt Code
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)

Kimi K2.7 Code vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

At a glance

MoonshotAI's coding-focused Kimi model for end-to-end software engineering.

82262K ctx$0.82/$3.75 per M#20/92

Google's frontier model with a large leap in core reasoning.

861.0M ctx$2.00/$12.00 per M#10/92
Agent Demos
All agent demos

No shared agent demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
Reasoning
CodingInsufficient data
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Cheaper65%
Capability
CapabilityECI81.8
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science89.5%Expert-Level—Factual Recall39.2%
Math
Competition Math1%96.4%Research Math—
Coding
Real-World Coding—
Agentic
Terminal Tasks—Novel Reasoning—Task Horizon—
Reasoning
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·Provider·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Smarter6%
Capability
CapabilityECI6%86.4
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science5%94.1%Expert-Level46.4%Factual Recall97%77.3%
Math
Competition Math95.6%Research Math36.9%
Coding
Real-World Coding80.6%
Agentic
Terminal Tasks80.2%Novel Reasoning77.1%Task Horizon6.4h
Specs
262K
Context
128K
Max output
Jun 2026
Released
1.0M
Context
66K
Max output
Feb 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input59%$0.82/M tokens
Output69%$3.75/M tokens
Cache read20%$0.16/M tokens
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$2.00/M tokens
Output$12.00/M tokens
Reasoning$12.00/M tokens
Cache read$0.20/M tokens
Cache write$0.38/M tokens
Image input$2.00/M tokens
Audio input$2.00/M tokens
Web search$0.01/search
Chat with Kimi K2.7 CodeGo to model
Chat with Gemini 3.1 ProGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Kimi K2.7 Code vs Gemini 3.1 Pro▼

Which is better, Kimi K2.7 Code or Gemini 3.1 Pro?

▼

Based on the Capability Index, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores higher (86.4 vs 81.8). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.7 Code or Gemini 3.1 Pro?

▼

Kimi K2.7 Code has a lower blended cost. Kimi K2.7 Code: $0.82 input / $3.75 output. Gemini 3.1 Pro: $2.00 input / $12.00 output.

Which has a larger context window, Kimi K2.7 Code or Gemini 3.1 Pro?

▼

Gemini 3.1 Pro has a larger context window: Kimi K2.7 Code supports 262K tokens vs Gemini 3.1 Pro at 1M tokens.

Do both Kimi K2.7 Code and Gemini 3.1 Pro support vision?

▼

Yes, both Kimi K2.7 Code and Gemini 3.1 Pro support vision/image input.

What are the key differences between Kimi K2.7 Code and Gemini 3.1 Pro?

▼

Key differences: Kimi K2.7 Code is significantly cheaper. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Kimi K2.7 Code and Gemini 3.1 Pro for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App