Compact reasoning model optimized for fast, cost-efficient STEM performance.
Google's high-efficiency model for coding, agentic workflows, and web and app development.
No shared agent demos for these models yet.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
This model hasn't been benchmarked yet.
Both o4-mini and Gemini 3.6 Flash are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.
o4-mini has a lower blended cost. o4-mini: $1.10 input / $4.40 output. Gemini 3.6 Flash: $1.50 input / $7.50 output.
Gemini 3.6 Flash has a larger context window: o4-mini supports 200K tokens vs Gemini 3.6 Flash at 1M tokens.
Yes, both o4-mini and Gemini 3.6 Flash support vision/image input.
o4-mini and Gemini 3.6 Flash have similar overall capabilities. The main differences lie in pricing, context window size, and provider-specific strengths. Use this comparison page to review all metrics side by side.
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both o4-mini and Gemini 3.6 Flash for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.