Efficient vision-language MoE with linear attention and 3B active parameters.
Google's high-efficiency model for coding, agentic workflows, and web and app development.
No shared agent demos for these models yet.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
This model hasn't been benchmarked yet.
Both Qwen3.5 35B A3B and Gemini 3.6 Flash are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.
Qwen3.5 35B A3B has a lower blended cost. Qwen3.5 35B A3B: $0.14 input / $1.00 output. Gemini 3.6 Flash: $1.50 input / $7.50 output.
Gemini 3.6 Flash has a larger context window: Qwen3.5 35B A3B supports 262K tokens vs Gemini 3.6 Flash at 1M tokens.
Yes, both Qwen3.5 35B A3B and Gemini 3.6 Flash support vision/image input.
Key differences: Qwen3.5 35B A3B is significantly cheaper. Compare full specs on this page.
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Qwen3.5 35B A3B and Gemini 3.6 Flash for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.