Skip to main content
idapt
HomeCodeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Voice Mode
  • Voice HUD
  • Web Search
  • Image Generation
  • Video Generation
  • Audio Generation
  • Transcription
  • Drive
  • Credentials
  • Sharing
  • Workspaces
  • Tasks
  • Memory
  • Agents
  • Subagents
  • Automations
  • Skills
  • idapt Code
  • Code Execution
  • Computers
  • Computer Use
  • Computer Assist · Soon
  • Containers · Soon
  • Cloud Computers
  • Local AI
  • AI Gateway
  • API & SDK
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Tunnels
  • All features →
  • LLM cost calculator
  • Token counter
  • Context window checker
  • Can I run it
  • Model picker quiz
  • Savings finder
  • Video cost estimator
  • Text to speech cost
  • Transcription cost
  • API endpoint tester
  • All free tools →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Skills
  • Learn
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • idapt Code
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)

Qwen3.7 Max vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

At a glance

Alibaba's flagship Qwen3.7 model, built for agent-centric workloads.

851M ctx$1.48/$4.42 per M#15/92

Google's frontier model with a large leap in core reasoning.

861.0M ctx$2.00/$12.00 per M#10/92
Agent Demos
All agent demos

No shared agent demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
Reasoning
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·Provider·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Cheaper51%
Capability
CapabilityECI84.7
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science91.6%Expert-Level38.1%Factual Recall58.5%
Math
Competition Math95.0%Research Math—
Coding
Real-World Coding77.3%Scientific Code53.5%
Agentic
Terminal Tasks69.7%Novel Reasoning—Task Horizon—
Reasoning
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·Provider·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Smarter2%
Capability
CapabilityECI2%86.4
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science3%94.1%Expert-Level22%46.4%Factual Recall32%77.3%
Math
Competition Math1%95.6%Research Math36.9%
Coding
Real-World Coding4%80.6%Scientific Code—
Agentic
Terminal Tasks15%80.2%Novel Reasoning77.1%Task Horizon6.4h
Specs
1M
Context
66K
Max output
May 2026
Released
1.0M
Context
66K
Max output
Feb 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input26%$1.48/M tokens
Output63%$4.42/M tokens
Cache read$0.29/M tokens
Cache write$1.84/M tokens
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$2.00/M tokens
Output$12.00/M tokens
Reasoning$12.00/M tokens
Cache read32%$0.20/M tokens
Cache write80%$0.38/M tokens
Image input$2.00/M tokens
Audio input$2.00/M tokens
Web search$0.01/search
Chat with Qwen3.7 MaxGo to model
Chat with Gemini 3.1 ProGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: Qwen3.7 Max vs Gemini 3.1 Pro▼

Which is better, Qwen3.7 Max or Gemini 3.1 Pro?

▼

Based on the Capability Index, Gemini 3.1 Pro scores higher (86.4 vs 84.7). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.7 Max or Gemini 3.1 Pro?

▼

Qwen3.7 Max has a lower blended cost. Qwen3.7 Max: $1.48 input / $4.42 output. Gemini 3.1 Pro: $2.00 input / $12.00 output.

Which has a larger context window, Qwen3.7 Max or Gemini 3.1 Pro?

▼

Gemini 3.1 Pro has a larger context window: Qwen3.7 Max supports 1M tokens vs Gemini 3.1 Pro at 1M tokens.

Do both Qwen3.7 Max and Gemini 3.1 Pro support vision?

▼

Gemini 3.1 Pro supports vision/image input, but Qwen3.7 Max does not.

Which has better coding performance, Qwen3.7 Max or Gemini 3.1 Pro?

▼

Gemini 3.1 Pro scores higher on SWE-bench Verified: Qwen3.7 Max resolves 77% vs Gemini 3.1 Pro at 81%.

What are the key differences between Qwen3.7 Max and Gemini 3.1 Pro?

▼

Key differences: only Gemini 3.1 Pro supports vision input. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Qwen3.7 Max and Gemini 3.1 Pro for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App