Thinking Machines Lab's open-weight multimodal model with 41B active parameters out of 975B total.
Z.ai's frontier reasoning model for long-context agents and software engineering.
No shared agent demos for these models yet.
No captured outputs for these models yet.
Both Inkling and GLM 5.2 are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.
GLM 5.2 has a lower blended cost. Inkling: $1.00 input / $4.05 output. GLM 5.2: $0.78 input / $2.44 output.
GLM 5.2 has a larger context window: Inkling supports 524K tokens vs GLM 5.2 at 1M tokens.
Inkling supports vision/image input, but GLM 5.2 does not.
GLM 5.2 scores higher on SWE-bench Verified: Inkling resolves 78% vs GLM 5.2 at 79%.
Key differences: only Inkling supports vision input. Compare full specs on this page.
If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both Inkling and GLM 5.2 for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.