Skip to main content
idapt
HomeCodeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Voice Mode
  • Voice HUD
  • Web Search
  • Image Generation
  • Video Generation
  • Audio Generation
  • Transcription
  • Drive
  • Credentials
  • Sharing
  • Workspaces
  • Tasks
  • Memory
  • Agents
  • Subagents
  • Automations
  • Skills
  • idapt Code
  • Code Execution
  • Computers
  • Computer Use
  • Computer Assist · Soon
  • Containers · Soon
  • Cloud Computers
  • Local AI
  • AI Gateway
  • API & SDK
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Tunnels
  • All features →
  • LLM cost calculator
  • Token counter
  • Context window checker
  • Can I run it
  • Model picker quiz
  • Savings finder
  • Video cost estimator
  • Text to speech cost
  • Transcription cost
  • API endpoint tester
  • All free tools →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Skills
  • Learn
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • idapt Code
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)

GLM 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro

At a glance

Zhipu AI's most capable model with a major leap in coding and long-horizon task performance.

82200K ctx$0.97/$3.04 per M#19/92

Open-source 1.6T-parameter MoE with 49B active, built for advanced reasoning and long-horizon agents.

821.0M ctx$0.43/$0.87 per M#21/92
Agent Demos
All agent demos

No shared agent demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
Reasoning
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Smarter1%
Capability
CapabilityECI1%82.3
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science85.5%Factual Recall37.3%
Math
Competition Math92.2%Research Math33.4%
Coding
Real-World Coding74.2%
Reasoning
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Cheaper63%
Capability
CapabilityECI81.6
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science5%89.6%Factual Recall53%57.0%
Math
Competition Math5%96.7%Research Math—
Coding
Real-World Coding5%77.6%
Specs
200K
Context
128K
Max output
Apr 2026
Released
1.0M
Context
256K
Max output
Apr 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$0.97/M tokens
Output$3.04/M tokens
Cache read$0.18/M tokens
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input55%$0.43/M tokens
Output71%$0.87/M tokens
Cache read98%$0.004/M tokens
Chat with GLM 5.1Go to model
Chat with DeepSeek V4 ProGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: GLM 5.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro▼

Which is better, GLM 5.1 or DeepSeek V4 Pro?

▼

Based on the Capability Index, GLM 5.1 scores higher (82.3 vs 81.6). However, "better" depends on your use case — pricing, speed, context window, and specific capability needs all matter.

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.1 or DeepSeek V4 Pro?

▼

DeepSeek V4 Pro has a lower blended cost. GLM 5.1: $0.97 input / $3.04 output. DeepSeek V4 Pro: $0.43 input / $0.87 output.

Which has a larger context window, GLM 5.1 or DeepSeek V4 Pro?

▼

DeepSeek V4 Pro has a larger context window: GLM 5.1 supports 200K tokens vs DeepSeek V4 Pro at 1M tokens.

Which has better coding performance, GLM 5.1 or DeepSeek V4 Pro?

▼

DeepSeek V4 Pro scores higher on SWE-bench Verified: GLM 5.1 resolves 74% vs DeepSeek V4 Pro at 78%.

What are the key differences between GLM 5.1 and DeepSeek V4 Pro?

▼

Key differences: DeepSeek V4 Pro is significantly cheaper. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both GLM 5.1 and DeepSeek V4 Pro for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App