Skip to main content
idapt
HomeAI ModelsPricing
Sign inStart free
  • Home
  • Pricing
  • AI Models
  • Image models
  • Voice models
  • Video models
  • Rankings
  • New models
  • Model status
  • Multi-Model Chat
  • Voice Mode
  • Voice HUD
  • Web Search
  • Image Generation
  • Video Generation
  • Audio Generation
  • Transcription
  • Drive
  • Secrets
  • Sharing
  • Workspaces
  • Tasks
  • Memory
  • Agents
  • Subagents
  • Automations
  • Skills
  • Code Execution
  • Computers
  • Computer Use
  • Computer Assist · Soon
  • Cloud Computers
  • Local AI
  • AI Gateway
  • API & SDK
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Tunnels
  • All features →
  • LLM cost calculator
  • Token counter
  • Context window checker
  • Can I run it
  • Model picker quiz
  • Savings finder
  • Video cost estimator
  • Text to speech cost
  • Transcription cost
  • API endpoint tester
  • All free tools →
  • Blog
  • Use cases
  • Comparisons
  • Best of
  • Learn
  • Prompts
  • Templates
  • Changelog
  • Help center
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Compare all models
  • Support
  • Developers
  • Quickstarts
  • API reference
  • API pricing
  • CLI
  • MCP
  • Downloads
  • Desktop
  • Badges and embeds
© idapt[email protected]TermsPrivacy PolicyLegal noticeReport content
X (Twitter)

GLM 5.2 vs Inkling

At a glance

Z.ai's frontier reasoning model for long-context agents and software engineering.

831.0M ctx$0.78/$2.44 per M#16/92

Thinking Machines Lab's open-weight multimodal model with 41B active parameters out of 975B total.

524K ctx$1.00/$4.05 per M
Agent Demos
All agent demos

No shared agent demos for these models yet.

AI Output
All AI outputs

No captured outputs for these models yet.

Benchmarks
See rankings
Reasoning
AgenticInsufficient data
Sources:Epoch ECI·Epoch AI·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-10
Cheaper32%
Capability
CapabilityECI83.4
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science5%91.9%Expert-Level—Factual Recall38.1%
Math
Competition Math86.4%
Coding
Real-World Coding1%78.7%
Agentic
Terminal Tasks—
Reasoning
Sources:Provider·OpenRouter· as of 2026-07-15
Capability
Capability—
Reasoning & Knowledge
Graduate Science87.2%Expert-Level29.7%Factual Recall15%43.9%
Math
Competition Math12%97.1%
Coding
Real-World Coding77.6%
Agentic
Terminal Tasks63.8%
Specs
1.0M
Context
131K
Max output
Jun 2026
Released
524K
Context
16K
Max output
Jul 2026
Released
Capabilities
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Vision
Audio
Reasoning
Pricing
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input22%$0.78/M tokens
Output40%$2.44/M tokens
Cache read15%$0.14/M tokens
Live pricing, shown before you run
Input$1.00/M tokens
Output$4.05/M tokens
Cache read$0.17/M tokens
Chat with GLM 5.2Go to model
Chat with InklingGo to model
Frequently Asked Questions: GLM 5.2 vs Inkling▼

Which is better, GLM 5.2 or Inkling?

▼

Both GLM 5.2 and Inkling are capable AI models. The best choice depends on your specific use case: consider pricing, context window, speed, and which capabilities (vision, reasoning, audio) you need.

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.2 or Inkling?

▼

GLM 5.2 has a lower blended cost. GLM 5.2: $0.78 input / $2.44 output. Inkling: $1.00 input / $4.05 output.

Which has a larger context window, GLM 5.2 or Inkling?

▼

GLM 5.2 has a larger context window: GLM 5.2 supports 1M tokens vs Inkling at 524K tokens.

Do both GLM 5.2 and Inkling support vision?

▼

Inkling supports vision/image input, but GLM 5.2 does not.

Which has better coding performance, GLM 5.2 or Inkling?

▼

GLM 5.2 scores higher on SWE-bench Verified: GLM 5.2 resolves 79% vs Inkling at 78%.

What are the key differences between GLM 5.2 and Inkling?

▼

Key differences: only Inkling supports vision input. Compare full specs on this page.

Which model should I choose for my use case?

▼

If cost is your priority, choose the cheaper option. If you need the highest intelligence for complex tasks, pick the higher-scoring model. For long documents or codebases, choose the larger context window. You can try both GLM 5.2 and Inkling for free on idapt.app to see which performs better for your specific needs.

Open in App