Productivity
Aggregate a hiring debrief
Four scorecards turned into one decision with the disagreement visible.
Fill it in
One per interviewer.
It is the most useful thing in the loop.
Only one of them is a signal.
Your prompt
Aggregate the debrief in . Separate EVIDENCE from impression for every rating. "Strong on system design" is an impression; "designed a workable sharding scheme and named the failure mode unprompted" is evidence. A summary built on impressions ranks confidence. Surface the DISAGREEMENT rather than averaging it. Two interviewers reaching opposite conclusions on the same competency is the most informative thing in the loop, and an average turns it into a mediocre score that nobody argues with. Map each rating to the competency it was supposed to assess, and flag anything nobody assessed. Summarise without recommending. The decision belongs to the hiring manager, and a summary that leads with a verdict changes how the evidence is read.
Continue and pick your folderOpens with everything above already filled in.
Why this works
Two interviewers reaching opposite conclusions on the same competency is the most informative thing in a loop, and averaging turns it into a mediocre score nobody argues with. This surfaces the disagreement and separates evidence from impression.