Productivity
Assess a candidate
A structured read of one CV against one role, with the reasoning shown.
Fill it in
The candidate.
Paste the description, or describe it.
What to probe in an interview rather than guess at.
Your prompt
Assess this candidate against the role. Role: [the role] Separate what the CV EVIDENCES from what it implies. "Led the migration" with no outcome is a claim; "cut deploy time from 40 minutes to 6" is evidence. A fit assessment built on claims ranks the better writer. Show the reasoning for every judgement, so a hiring manager can disagree with the reasoning rather than the score. A number with no working is worse than no number, because it gets treated as objective. Do not infer anything about the person from their name, their school, or the gap in their dates. Ask about the gap. End with what to probe in the interview: the two or three things the CV genuinely does not tell you.
Use Assess a candidateOpens with everything above already filled in.
Why this works
A fit assessment built on claims ranks the better writer. This separates what a CV evidences from what it implies, shows the reasoning behind every judgement so a hiring manager can argue with the reasoning rather than the score, and ends with what to actually probe.
Questions
- Does it infer anything from names or schools?
- No. It also asks about a date gap rather than assuming.